1.“Human
nature is greedy; Greed is tied in to Human nature”
Most people living under capitalism believe this statement because capitalism raises them to believe it. This "greed is natural" garbage can easily be destroyed. The existence of communists and planned socialist economic systems makes the "human greed" statement invalid. From this, before the time of capitalism, feudalism, monarchy, etc., before the establishment of government or national hierarchy, the only way to survive and live, was through collective solidarity and communal work. This makes the statement that “greed is natural” an invalid argument. Solidarity and collective organization are human nature. Greed is a learned behavior brought in to human thinking through the influence of anti-social forces, an unnatural behavior appropriated to appear as “normal.”
Most people living under capitalism believe this statement because capitalism raises them to believe it. This "greed is natural" garbage can easily be destroyed. The existence of communists and planned socialist economic systems makes the "human greed" statement invalid. From this, before the time of capitalism, feudalism, monarchy, etc., before the establishment of government or national hierarchy, the only way to survive and live, was through collective solidarity and communal work. This makes the statement that “greed is natural” an invalid argument. Solidarity and collective organization are human nature. Greed is a learned behavior brought in to human thinking through the influence of anti-social forces, an unnatural behavior appropriated to appear as “normal.”
2.“Communist
dictatorships have failed”
Let's
debunk this by first, explaining what communism is. Communism by
Marxist definition and ideological accuracy, is a global, stateless
society; Absent of government, currency, imperialism, war, etc. Thus,
to make an argument as if communism has ever existed in human
history, even in the form of a state is inaccurate because Marx
himself went to great pains to explain that true communism does not
exist until the state "withers away."
Secondly,
Socialist dictatorships, which is what many call “Communist
Dictatorships” have not failed, nor are they “dictatorships” in
the concept as what capitalists use them as. Capitalists use the term
“dictatorships” because under such establishment, capitalists are
suppressed under the power of the proletariat, just as when the
bourgeoisie holds power and control over the state apparatus, they
oppress the Proletariat, which is a "dictatorship" of the
bourgeoisie. Dictatorship of the proletariat is the democratic action
and order of the proletariat; dictatorship of suppressing capitalist
parasites from positions of government power, or power to exploit. In
response to the statement that states with socialist planned
economies have failed, the reverse is true. In countries like the
USSR, DPRK, Cuba, etc. Socialist economies have been successful,
outperforming capitalist ones. This means that socialism is not
successful from the bourgeois point of view; with their interest in
exploitation and profit over humanitarian values. To the communist,
successful means a citizenry that is completely liberated and united,
and that collectively produces for humanity on a scale that puts the
bourgeoisie in perpetual fear.
3.“Communism/Socialism
is the equivalent of fascism”
Communism/Socialism
and fascism are polar opposites. Fascism is a by-product
of decaying capitalism. Fascism is defined as follows: "[The]
open terrorist dictatorship
of the most reactionary section of the monopoly
capitalists."
"The two main features are: (1) At home, brutal suppression of
democratic
rights of masses and the enslavement of all toilers; (2) abroad, wars
of spoliation and conquest, prepared for and carried through by
'totalitarian' organization of nation, by 'bestial chauvinism,'
abandonment of every moral principle, extinction of other States,
wholesale massacres and enslavement of entire nations."
[Marxist Glossary, L.
Harry Gould, Australia, 1948]
It
is the desperate attempt of capitalists to steal as much as possible
nationally and internationally through the acts of mass terror and
imperialism. Extremist racism intertwined with right-wing
authoritarianism creates a rhetoric that leads from right-wing
populism to fascism. This rhetoric is dangerous if the masses are
already deeply divided upon racist influence and permit right-wing
totalitarianism to take full power. Communists and Socialists argue
and fight for solidarity among races and for proletarian political
power; fascism, as an attempt to weaken the worker liberation,
disbands Communist Parties, unions, democratic institutions etc. thus
making them easier to control and exploit on a massive scale.
Corporate power is merged with state power, allowing the big
bourgeoisie to make the decisions next to the fascist dictator they
support, finance, and protect. With regard to race, we can see
clearly from history, the bourgeoisie will divide the masses upon
lines of race, gender, religion, national origin etc. and will target
all who are not part of the bourgeois class.
4.“Capitalism
gave you everything, without it you wouldn't have it”
Capitalism gives you nothing, capitalism produces nothing. Workers do. Workers, with their labor, are what produces everything you have. Labor creates all value. Capitalism guarantees that capitalists own the means of production, and siphon off the profit from the labor of the working class.
Capitalism gives you nothing, capitalism produces nothing. Workers do. Workers, with their labor, are what produces everything you have. Labor creates all value. Capitalism guarantees that capitalists own the means of production, and siphon off the profit from the labor of the working class.
“How
can you hate capitalism when you use a computer, i phone, i pad,
etc.?”
The
bourgeoisie in the 1700's was slaughtered using the guillotine,
what's your point? Ever heard the quote from Lenin that "The
capitalists will sell us the rope with which they will hang
themselves" ?
This is the same concept. Every product that workers create that the
bourgeoisie profits from, can be used in the name of the continuation
of capitalism, or to fight against it. In bourgeois society, there is
no way to get around this fact. For fighting capitalism, the tools
will be the products built by. and purchased by, the proletariat.
5.“Workers
unions and angry striking workers are bad for business”
Unions
and angry striking workers are bad for bourgeoisie business, only
because it makes the capitalism vulnerable and hinders its ability to
transition to the natural stage of capitalism which is extreme
exploitation for maximum profits. This stage is sometimes called "the
race to the bottom." Even though unions do not take the
revolutionary road of Marxism, they unite the working force and
organize them to speak up for better treatment, which makes organized
workers the most advanced in the class struggle. This can easily turn
into a class conscious group, making the bourgeoisie tremble, for
they cannot manipulate and exploit class conscious workers as they'd
like.
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteExcellent analysis. I just wanted to add one point that's consistently asked, why did the Soviet Union call if socialism is so great? The Soviet Union didn't fall. What happened was Gorbachev along with a few traitorous government officials orchestrated a coup funded by Soros, western banking interests, and the US government. It happened so fast, was so well-organized, the people had no idea what happened, especially as the media was controlled by Yeltsin & other traitors by this point. Moreover, People were promised a Western lifestyle. What Russian people didn't know was that what they saw in films and TV was the lifestyles of the American upper classes. What they were not seeing was the other side of U.S. life, hunger, poverty, and homelessness caused by capitalist exploitation.
ReplyDelete